Also, if you're a purest for the original '85 High OG shape and details, the Mid’s proportions might feel off. And if you already have multiple similar colorways in the Jordan series, this might be a pass. It’s a fantastic shoe, but it doesn’t reinvent the wheel. Let’s talk pros. Major advantage? Versatility and price. For around $135, you get a shoe that goes with almost anything. The build is solid for regular use. I’ve always felt the Jordan Mid 1 offers that perfect balance between the High and the Low—it’s just a smart, classic design that rarely fails. It’s a workhorse in the Jordan series for a reason. After wearing these for a day, my final take? They get the job done. The comfort is fine for walking around, the style is a 10/10, and they turn heads just like the Highs do. Is it the most exciting sneaker? Maybe not. But is it a dependable, classic piece you'll wear all the time? Absolutely. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" is a workhorse in my collection. How do they look on camera? Honestly, the Mid cut is super versatile. Sometimes Highs can look a bit bulky, but the "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits just right. This "Neutral Grey" pair I'm wearing is "clean". It works with jeans, joggers—you name it. The design is timeless; it’s why this model stays relevant. Compared to a Dunk, the toe box is slightly roomier, which I prefer. A definite "pro" is its effortless style. A "con"? The flat, non-supportive insole might not be for everyone with foot issues.
