Air jordan mid 1 : Here's a potential con, though- purists might argue it's not the "OG" High cut [n2k8pjjd]

And you know what? They're right. But not everyone needs or wants that. If you're a stickler for the original 1985 specs, this isn't it. But for a stylish, wearable sneaker? It absolutely gets the job done. Potential downside? The ankle padding isn't as thick as on some Highs. If you have super sensitive ankles, that's something to note. Also, the outsole traction is good for walking, but I wouldn't recommend these for actual balling—that's not their purpose anymore. As a lifestyle shoe, the Air Jordan Mid 1 absolutely delivers on its promise. Comparing these to other Jordans? The Air Jordan Mid 1 sits perfectly between the High & the Low. You lose some of the High's "legendary" ankle coverage & styling options, but you gain a bit more everyday flexibility. Versus a modern Jordan like the 36? It's a completely different world — this is about heritage, not performance tech. For $135 USD, it's a style piece. So, should "you" cop? If you want a stylish, everyday sneaker with legendary status, "absolutely" grab an Air Jordan Mid 1. But if your priority is cutting-edge comfort or a performance hoop shoe, you might wanna look elsewhere. For me, it's a staple. Thanks for watching—let me know your thoughts on the Mids down below

• Shown: Royal
• Style: 384664-006