Air jordan mid 1 : Now, potential cons (gotta be real) [p0iiipoi]

Purists will "always" argue for the High top. The materials, while good, aren't always "top-tier" like some Special Edition Jordans. If you need max ankle support for ball, look elsewhere. It’s a lifestyle sneaker first. That's the honest truth with this air jordan mid 1. Comparing this AJ1 Mid to my other Jordans? It fills a perfect niche. It’s more accessible—both in price (~$135) and style—than chasing OG Highs. Versus something like a Jordan 3 or 4? The Mid 1 is "much" lighter on foot and has that timeless, minimalist profile. It's a foundational sneaker in any collection, no doubt. Alright, let's get these on feet. The initial feel? The Air Jordan Mid 1 offers a snug, true-to-size fit for me. The ankle padding is decent — it's not as high as the OG Highs, but it gives good support. The cushioning is... well, it's firm. Don't expect modern, bouncy comfort; it's more about that classic, stable court feel. Who should maybe skip it? If you need maximum comfort, arch support, or a performance-oriented shoe - look elsewhere. Also, if you're only interested in the most premium materials and details, you might be disappointed. The "air jordan mid 1" is about the silhouette and heritage first. It's not trying to be a luxury item or a tech marvel.

• Shown: Blank Canvas
• Style: CT8529-003