Terms of the offer
It’s more accessible—both in price (~$135) and style—than chasing OG Highs. Versus something like a Jordan 3 or 4? The Mid 1 is "much" lighter on foot and has that timeless, minimalist profile. It's a foundational sneaker in any collection, no doubt. Now, the real talk - potential cons. The cushioning is basic. If you're on your feet all day, this isn't your shoe. The leather quality can vary by colorway; some might feel a bit stiff. Also, as a "mid 1", it doesn't have the exact same cultural cachet as an OG High for some purists. It’s a classic, but know what you're getting: a heritage design, not modern tech. What's up, everyone? Just got the Air Jordan Mid 1 in this classic "Black Toe" colorway in hand. For around $135 USD, the quality here is "really" solid. The leather feels nice, the classic silhouette is "always" a win. Straight out of the box, this Jordan Mid 1 just looks iconic. My first impression? It's a clean, versatile pickup for sure. Comparing it to other Jordans... If you have a High, you don't "need" a Mid, but it's a different vibe. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" is easier to put on and off, for sure. It’s less of a statement, more of an everyday shoe. I find myself grabbing these for quick errands more often than my Highs. The price difference in the "Jordan series" makes the Mid a fantastic entry point. Just know the materials might be slightly different—sometimes less leather, more synthetic. Still a great shoe for the money.
- Shown: Rookie Of The Year
- Style: AQ9129-103
