Terms of the offer
It's for the style-conscious person who appreciates heritage. It's "not" for the performance athlete or the comfort-first wearer. At "$125 USD", it's a fair deal for an icon. You're buying into the legacy. Would I choose it over a High if both were retail? Probably not. But for availability and value, the Mid wins. It's a cornerstone shoe. What do you think? Let me know in the comments below Now, the not-so-great part. The break-in period can be "real"—the heel and pinky toe area might rub for the first few wears. Also, that classic Jordan 1 outsole traction? It can get "slippery" on wet surfaces, so maybe not your go-to rain shoe. Just keeping it 100% with you guys. Wearing these around, I appreciate the "Mid" cut more and more. It offers that classic "Jordan 1" profile but is easier to get on and off than the Highs. There's a certain nostalgia factor with the "Air Jordan Mid 1" that modern retros sometimes lack. It feels authentic, like a direct link to the court styles of the past. Now, a potential con? The materials can vary "a lot" by colorway. Some feel stiff and plasticky. If you're used to super-soft, broken-in leather, certain Air Jordan Mid 1 releases might disappoint. Always check reviews for the specific pair you want!
- Shown: Cherry
- Style: 384664-060
