Air jordan mid 1 : Now, potential cons (gotta be real) [uxzdprid]

Purists will "always" argue for the High top. The materials, while good, aren't always "top-tier" like some Special Edition Jordans. If you need max ankle support for ball, look elsewhere. It’s a lifestyle sneaker first. That's the honest truth with this air jordan mid 1. Let's talk materials on this 'Particle Grey' Air Jordan Mid 1. It uses a mix of leather and synthetic—it's fine for the cost. On foot, they feel lighter than they look! The ankle padding is sufficient. The design is just "chef's kiss"—it's why the Jordan 1 Mid remains popular. Honestly, the biggest advantage over the High is often availability and price. Not a performance shoe by any means. Perfect for casual wear, not for balling or long-distance walks. Who should "avoid" these? If supreme all-day comfort is your #1 priority, look at modern performance models or lifestyle runners. Also, if you're a purest for the OG High-top silhouette, the Mid's shorter collar might bug you. But if you appreciate the design language of the Jordan 1 and want a practical version? The Air Jordan Mid 1 is a fantastic option. Who might want to skip it? Serious performance basketball players should look elsewhere—tech is outdated. Also, if supreme all-day comfort is your #1 priority, this isn't it. And if you're a Jordan 1 High OG purist who only wants the original silhouette, the Mid's proportions might not satisfy you. It serves a specific, style-driven purpose.

• Shown: Off Noir
• Style: 555088-062