Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it to a High? The Air Jordan Mid 1 lacks the iconic high-top collar and that "ultimate" ankle lockdown [vasfhxer]

For ball, I'd go High. But for style? The Mid is way easier to throw on and go. It sits between the High and the Low, offering a unique profile that's super wearable. A great alternative in the Jordan series. Now, the real talk - potential cons. The cushioning is basic. If you're on your feet all day, this isn't your shoe. The leather quality can vary by colorway; some might feel a bit stiff. Also, as a "mid 1", it doesn't have the exact same cultural cachet as an OG High for some purists. It’s a classic, but know what you're getting: a heritage design, not modern tech. Yo, for this Chicago-inspired Air Jordan Mid 1, the red hits just pop. Unboxing feels nostalgic every time. The toe box has that nice shape. Wearing them, they feel secure—the Mid cut is a sweet spot for me. Visually, they look fantastic on camera, that classic profile always works. Downside? The leather can crease pretty quickly. Worth it? If you love the Jordan 1 legacy but want a slightly different silhouette, absolutely. Not for comfort-first seekers, though. On foot, this colorway really pops! The design is so iconic. Compared to the Air Jordan 1 High, the Mid has that slightly shorter collar, which I think makes it a bit more versatile for everyday style. It's a timeless look that works with jeans or shorts. Honestly, the camera loves this shoe's clean lines.

• Shown: Infrared
• Style: DX2836-001