You lose some of the High's "legendary" ankle coverage & styling options, but you gain a bit more everyday flexibility. Versus a modern Jordan like the 36? It's a completely different world — this is about heritage, not performance tech. For $135 USD, it's a style piece. Is it worth the $135? For the style, heritage, and versatility – I'd say yes. You're paying for the design and the legacy. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" isn't trying to be a tech marvel; it's a style icon. And for that purpose, it delivers exactly what it promises. Just got these in – the "Air Jordan Mid 1" in the ‘Banned’ color-blocking. The red hits against black are just "fire" on camera. Construction seems solid overall. Sliding into them, the fit is familiar and secure. Weight-wise, they're noticeably lighter than my AJ1 Highs, which I actually prefer for walking. The pro here is sheer versatility and that instant recognizability. However, the insole is pretty basic, so consider an upgrade if you're on your feet all day. Personally? I think this model is perfect for someone who wants the iconic look without the High-top commitment or price. Not a performance pick, but a style staple. On foot, the design really pops. The contrast of the black and white panels is so clean and versatile. I've been wearing these for a few hours now, and they look great with jeans or shorts. The Mid cut is, in my opinion, super underrated in the whole Jordan series. It offers a perfect balance for a lot of outfits.
