It’s more accessible—both in price (~$135) and style—than chasing OG Highs. Versus something like a Jordan 3 or 4? The Mid 1 is "much" lighter on foot and has that timeless, minimalist profile. It's a foundational sneaker in any collection, no doubt. On feet, the look is undeniable. That Mid cut hits a sweet spot for me—it's less bulky than some modern sneakers but still has that Jordan 1 presence. The leather on this pair? It's decent! Not buttery premium, but it's durable & should crease nicely. For the price point (~$135), I'm not complaining. They look sharp on camera, y'know? Final thoughts on this 'Banned' inspired Air Jordan Mid 1. The black and red combo is just powerful. The shoe looks aggressive and clean. Fit is standard; break them in. The advantage of the Mid? Often easier to cop at retail—around $130. The disadvantage? Materials can be hit or miss depending on the release. I'd recommend this to anyone wanting that iconic Jordan 1 vibe with a slightly more modern (and affordable) feel. Hard pass if you're all about the highest quality leathers. Here's the pro: Timeless style. You can't go wrong with a "Jordan 1 Mid". Cons? The break-in period can be stiff, & the materials vary by colorway. For ~$135 USD~, you're paying for the "iconic design" more than premium tech. It's a lifestyle sneaker, first & foremost.
