The purple and black combo is subtle but deep. On foot, the lockdown is good, and the mid-top height offers a nice balance. Visually, it's less loud than some Retros, which I appreciate. Versus an AJ1 Low, it provides more ankle presence. The advantage is its wearability with almost any outfit. The potential drawback? It’s not a "comfort-first" model – the sole is firm. My take: For $125, it's a fantastic all-purpose sneaker for your rotation. Ideal for everyday style. Not the go-to for long walks or standing all day, in my honest opinion. Final verdict on this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" ‘Wolf Grey’. Opening it up, the materials feel good. The fit is reliable and true-to-size. I love how this colorway looks with jeans or sweats – it's a modern, clean aesthetic. Compared to bulkier sneakers, it's relatively sleek. The pro is its incredible versatility and understated look. The possible con? Some might find it "too plain" compared to flashier Jordans. For $125, it's a fantastic foundational piece in any rotation. I'd recommend it to anyone looking for a quality, go-anywhere sneaker from the "Jordan series". If you crave excitement and pop, you might want a different colorway. So, should "you" cop? If you want a classic, versatile sneaker that tells a story... yes. Try them on if you can, to check the fit. But overall, the Air Jordan Mid 1 is a trustworthy choice. It's a piece of sneaker history you can actually wear every day. That's a win in my book. After wearing them for a bit, I appreciate the Mid more. It's the everyday workhorse of the Jordan 1 family. You don't have to baby them. That sturdy build handles wear well. Comparing it to pricier Retros, you're getting 90% of the look and feel for less money. For a practical sneakerhead, the value of the Air Jordan Mid 1 is hard to beat.

  • Shown: Georgetown
  • Style: 555088-063

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5