Terms of the offer
Also, if you have very wide feet, the narrow-ish toe box on the Air Jordan Mid 1 might feel restrictive. In that case, look for models with more room. Comparing it directly to the Air Jordan 1 High? The most obvious difference is the collar height—it cuts off right above the ankle. Materials can sometimes be simpler on the Mid version, but for a daily beater, that's fine. The biggest pro is the price point. You're entering the Jordan 1 world at a more accessible level, which is a huge plus for many. Just got these in – the "Air Jordan Mid 1" in the ‘Banned’ color-blocking. The red hits against black are just "fire" on camera. Construction seems solid overall. Sliding into them, the fit is familiar and secure. Weight-wise, they're noticeably lighter than my AJ1 Highs, which I actually prefer for walking. The pro here is sheer versatility and that instant recognizability. However, the insole is pretty basic, so consider an upgrade if you're on your feet all day. Personally? I think this model is perfect for someone who wants the iconic look without the High-top commitment or price. Not a performance pick, but a style staple. Now, the potential con? The comfort tech is "old". There's a small Air unit in the heel, but let's be real—it's not a modern performance or max-comfort shoe. If you want plush cushioning, look elsewhere. Also, some purists will always argue the High-top is the "real" version. But for most daily uses, the "mid 1" is perfectly fine.
- Shown: Royal Toe
- Style: CZ0774-300
