Air jordan mid 1 : Potential con? The tech, or lack thereof [znjswh2o]

It's a 1985 design, so the cushioning is basic. If you're used to modern, plush sneakers, the firm feel might be a shock. Also, the ankle collar on this Mid cut — while comfortable — offers less lockdown than a High for actual basketball. Know what you're buying: a lifestyle icon, "not" a performance beast. Honest talk about the feel: The "air jordan mid 1" is not a "plush" shoe. Your foot sits "on" the platform, not "in" it, if that makes sense. The arch support is minimal. If you're used to modern, engineered sneakers, this will feel... basic. But that's also its charm - it's pure, unfiltered heritage basketball design. Comparing it to other Jordans... The air jordan mid 1 sits "right" between the OG High and the Low. You lose some of the iconic High-top lockdown for basketball, but you gain easier wearability. Versus a Jordan 3 or 4? It's a totally different vibe—much more minimal and flat. It's a foundational piece in the Jordan series, for sure. Conversely, who should skip it? Hardcore performance players, obviously. Also, if you have "very" wide feet, the break-in could be tough. And if you're a purest who believes only the Air Jordan 1 High counts? This mid-top version might feel like a compromise. It's all about your personal preference and needs.

• Shown: Obsidian
• Style: 378037-003