They're worlds apart! The Retro 1 is about heritage style & a firm, grounded feel. The 36 is a modern performance beast. The Retro 1's advantage is its iconic status in the Jordan series and that unbeatable streetwear look. At ~$180, it's a style investment. Not for serious ball anymore, but for daily wear? It's a cornerstone sneaker. Final verdict: Who is the Air Jordan Retro 1 for? Sneakerheads, style-focused wearers, and fans of basketball history. It's for people who value look over supreme comfort. Who is it NOT for? Folks needing all-day support, people with very wide feet, or anyone seeking modern, bouncy cushioning. For me? It's a forever classic, but know what you're buying into. Hey what's up everyone, unboxing these "air jordan retro 1" 'Bred Toes'! "Man", the color blocking is just "iconic" – the red pops perfectly against that black and white. On foot, the leather is stiffer than I hoped – they'll need a "real" break-in period. Visually? They look "incredible" on-camera and on the street. "Advantage?" Pure, unfiltered "Jordan" series heritage. "Downside?" That break-in can be rough. For $180-ish USD, if you love the history & the look, go for it. If you prioritize immediate comfort, maybe look at a "Jordan" 3 or 4 instead. So, I just got these in – the "air jordan retro 1" 'Pine Green'. "First" impression? That green hits different in person, very "crisp". On-feet, the fit is snug (I went TTS) and the toe box feels a bit narrow initially. Aesthetically, this "Jordan" 1 is a "statement" piece without being too loud. "What's good?" Unique color that still feels classic. "What's not?" Might be tight for wide-footers. At this $180 USD price point, it's fantastic for adding a pop to your rotation. Probably "not" the one if you have wider feet or prefer muted tones.

  • Shown: Court Purple
  • Style: 555088-403

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5