Air jordan retro 3 : Now, potential cons? The toe box creasing [es0o7nua]

It's going to happen with this leather, so if you're a perfectionist, that might bug you. Also, at $210, it's not cheap. Some might find the cushioning a bit basic compared to newer models. And the Elephant Print—while I like it—can be a love-it-or-hate-it design element for some people. Just being real. My final take? For me, this Air Jordan Retro 3 'White Cement' is a definite cop. It's a faithful, well-executed retro of an all-time great. The pros – the look, the history, the quality – far outweigh the cons of firm cushioning. It's a shoe I'll wear for years. If you've been waiting for a good version of this classic, I think your wait is over. This one delivers. Major pros? Timeless design, first and foremost. The 'Reimagined' treatment with the aged midsole gives it character right out of the box. Durability seems great – that leather should crease nicely. Also, that 'Nike Air' on the heel is a huge nostalgia factor for collectors. It's a shoe that tells a story. For a retro, they nailed the important details on this version. Alright, so I just got the Air Jordan Retro 3 'White Cement Reimagined' in hand. First off, the box is classic, and the shoe itself? The quality is "really" nice. That 'aged' look on the elephant print and midsole? It's done well, not too over-the-top. The shape is "on point" – a proper, chunky AJ3 silhouette. For $210 USD, the presentation is solid.

• Shown: Georgetown
• Style: 378037-005