Air jordan retro 3 : Comparing these to other Jordans? Well, the Air Jordan Retro 3 sits uniquely [ojwlaswt]

It's more structured and has more of a "bulky" classic feel than an AJ1, but it's way more wearable than something like an AJ2 or AJ4 for all-day comfort, in my opinion. The 3 has always been that perfect middle ground between style and a decent wear experience. Putting these Air Jordan 3s on? Immediate comfort. The padded collar & tongue hug your ankle perfectly, no break-in needed. They're not ultra-light, but the weight feels solid, not clunky. For a retro, the cushioning is decent – you can wear these all day. It's a classic for a reason. Now, the cons, because it's not for everyone. That toe box creases – it's just part of the game with this leather. Also, if you're used to modern, plush cushioning like in a Jordan 38? This will feel stiff. The $210 USD price tag is steep for retro tech. It's a lifestyle shoe first, performance second. Alright, so I just got the Air Jordan Retro 3 'White Cement Reimagined' in hand. First off, the box is classic. The shoe itself? The shape is "on point" this time. That 'Nike Air' on the back heel is a major win, honestly. The leather feels more like the OG, not that stiff stuff. For $210 USD, this is a solid release from the Jordan series. My initial impression is very, very positive.

• Shown: Black Cat
• Style: BQ4422 100