Ventilation? Those little mesh windows? Mostly for show — your feet will get warm. Also, the midsole paint on some older pairs is notorious for chipping (a.k.a. "creasing"). And at around $200+ USD, you're not getting cutting-edge tech. You're buying into a legend, not performance innovation. That's a dealbreaker for some. Comparing it to other Retros? The "Air Jordan Retro 4" is noticeably heavier and more structured than a "Jordan 3". The 3 might feel a bit more flexible from the jump. Cushioning-wise, a "Jordan 11" or "13" feels more responsive for all-day wear. This one’s about iconic style over cutting-edge comfort. It’s a different experience from the newer "Jordan" models with more tech, that's for sure. Who should maybe pass? Hardcore performance basketball players—please look at modern models. Also, if you need wide-fitting shoes, definitely try before you buy. If you prefer minimal, lightweight sneakers, the Retro 4 will feel bulky and heavy to you. It's a specific look and feel. My advice? If you're on the fence, watch some more reviews and see them in person. The $210 price tag demands consideration. What's up, everyone? Just got the new 'University Blue' "Air Jordan Retro 4" in. "Man" – that color just pops in person, way better than in pics. Lacing them up, the fit is true-to-size, and the support around the ankle is fantastic – a real standout feature of the 4s. Compared to, say, an AJ1, these feel more structured and protective for sure. Major pro? Timeless style. Con? They can feel a bit heavy after long hours. Perfect for collectors & casual wear, not for all-day, "everyday" comfort seekers.
