Terms of the offer
.. unboxing it, the first thing I notice? That "royal-esque" blue is super clean in hand. The leather feels good – not top-tier but definitely solid for a $200-ish Retro High. On foot? Honestly, it's a classic AJ1 feel: a bit stiff "initially", but the lockdown is fantastic. The colorway is super versatile; it pops just enough without being crazy. If you're new to the Jordan series, this is a great, wearable start. But if you need "cloud-like" comfort, look elsewhere. Now, the not-so-great stuff. The ankle padding can feel a bit rough during initial wears. Also, the outsole traction on smooth wet surfaces? Be careful - it's not the best. Some sneakerheads will always dismiss the Mid silhouette compared to the High. And yeah, at $120 USD, you might wish for slightly nicer materials. It's a trade-off. It's a great looking shoe, but it has its quirks. So, is it worth the $180? For me, yes. You're paying for the design legacy and a super wearable color. My advice? If you like the look, go for it. Try them on, see how that classic AJ1 fit works for you. Just go in with the right expectations - it's about style and history, not groundbreaking comfort. The blue Air Jordan 1 is a certified classic, done right. Just put on this "Blue Air Jordan 1" Mid, and "man", the color "really" shines in natural light. It’s a "sharp", clean look. The insole is "basic", as expected—zero arch support. Walking around, you feel that "firm" Phylon midsole. "Compared" to something like a Dunk, the AJ1 has a "more" structured, "supportive" feel. I "love" it for short outings or style fits. "However", if you have wide feet? The narrow toe box "could" be an issue. "Solid" pickup for the price, though.
- Shown: Cap And Gown
- Style: CT8532-104
