Dior air jordan 1 : Comparing it side-by-side with my Chicago 1s… the difference in leather quality is night and day [6hatdfwb]

The Dior version is buttery soft, while the retro is more rigid. Is that worth the massive price difference? For most, no. But for the specific hype & luxury appeal of the "dior air jordan 1"? To some, absolutely. Who is this "for"? If you have the disposable income and love sneaker culture's intersection with high fashion, this is a grail. The grey and white Dior x Jordan colorway is incredibly versatile for high-end fits. But if you're on a budget or just want a great Jordan 1 to beat up – this is "not" it. Save your money and get a classic retro. Pros? Unmatched materials / and detailing. The status is undeniable; it's the ultimate grail for many. The collaboration / between Dior and Jordan is executed flawlessly. Cons? The obvious one – the $2,000 USD price tag is astronomical. Also, that stiff, premium leather needs a serious break-in period for real comfort. It's not a "ready-for-a-long-day" shoe right out of the box. If you're thinking about copping these as an investment piece, the Dior Air Jordan 1 has certainly held value. But as a "sneaker" to wear? The experience is... interesting. You feel special wearing them, no lie. Yet, the constant fear of damaging a $2,000+ shoe is real. The advantage is the feeling and the look. The disadvantage is that it can almost feel too precious to enjoy fully. It's a weird paradox. For true enjoyment, I'd rather wear a sneaker I don't have to constantly baby.

• Shown: Black Toe
• Style: CT8532-104