This shoe lives up to the hype in terms of construction and design. It's a piece of history. The pros: Unrivaled quality, iconic collaboration status, and a surprisingly wearable colorway. The cons: The astronomical cost ($2,000 USD!) and the initial stiffness. Who should buy it? Those with disposable income seeking a crown jewel for their collection. Who shouldn't? Anyone expecting a performance upgrade or who would stress about wear and tear. For me? It's a 10/10 for what it is. Let's talk about the look in person / versus on camera. The subtle Dior branding – the "AIR DIOR" on the sole, the Wing logo – these details pop in real life. The colorway is so versatile; it's a grey/white masterpiece. However, that pristine, "almost-too-perfect" leather? It’s gonna crease. Fast. If you're afraid of putting wear on a $2,000 shoe, this "dior air jordan 1" might give you anxiety. That's a real consideration. Alright, let's get into it. First impression out of the box? The "quality" is immediately next level. This isn't your standard "Dior Air Jordan 1"—the Italian leather feels insane, and that 'Wing Logo' with the Dior monogram is just... "chef's kiss". The grey "Dior Grey" colorway is so premium and clean. For a $2,000 sneaker, the presentation alone sets a crazy high bar. You just "know" you're holding something special the second you pick it up. On foot, the fit is surprisingly true to a typical "Air Jordan 1"—snug at first. The insole has that co-branded logo, which is a nice touch. But let's be real: the脚感 (foot feel) isn't revolutionary; it's still a firm, classic AJ1 ride. The weight feels substantial, quality substantial, not clunky. The real magic is how it looks on foot—the shape is impeccable, and the materials crease in a more refined way. It’s a style-over-ultimate-comfort piece, for sure.

  • Shown: Lucky Green
  • Style: DN3707-160

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5