Terms of the offer
The monogram-patterned swoosh is subtle but incredible up close. The icy outsole with the Dior branding? "Chef's kiss". It elevates the entire sneaker. Comparing it to a standard retro, the craftsmanship and material quality are simply on another level – and they "should" be for this price. The colorway is its biggest strength—so easy to style. The grey is perfect. But let's talk cons: availability was crazy limited, and resale is astronomical. You're buying into an exclusive club. As a "wearable" shoe, it's fantastic. As a $2,000 investment... that's a personal call. For me, the experience of unboxing and wearing it is unique. I have to address the elephant in the room: value. At $2,000 USD retail, you're paying for the name and the collaboration. The performance or comfort isn't 10x better than a $170 Jordan 1. That's the honest truth. The pros are all about design, craftsmanship, and exclusivity. The cons are practical: cost and wearability. So, who is this for? Investors, serious collectors, and fashion icons. Who should skip it? Anyone seeking functional comfort or who feels uneasy about wearing such a pricey item on their feet. Wearing these out, the "visual" impact is crazy. In natural light, the monogram pattern is subtle but "definitely" there. It's a flex, but a sophisticated one. For $2,000 USD, you're getting a piece of fashion history colliding with sneaker culture. As a shoe in the "Jordan series", it stands completely alone. The advantage? Unmatched exclusivity and materials. The downside? You'll be paranoid about creasing them.
- Shown: Bred Toe
- Style: DH9696-100
