Terms of the offer
If your priority is all-day comfort or performance basketball, spend your money on a newer model. For me, it's a keeper – flaws and all. It's just that iconic. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Now, the not-so-great stuff — gotta be real. The main drawback? That break-in period. The leather can be stiff at first. Also, breathability is... not a thing. Your feet will get warm. If you prioritize supreme, all-day comfort above all else? This might not be your #1 pick. It's a style-first, comfort-second kind of shoe — always has been. Got the classic 'Chicago' Jordan Air 1 Retro High OG. Man, unboxing this legend... the red just "pops" against the white. It's history in a box. On foot, it's the same familiar fit—secure, but don't expect cloud-like comfort. It's about the look and the legacy, "period". Comparing it to newer Jordan models with Zoom? No contest on cushion. Pro: unbeatable iconic status. Con: premium price (often over $200) for a "firm" experience. A grail for collectors, but a practical choice for daily beaters? Maybe not.
- Shown: Yellow Toe
- Style: DJ5718-242
