The "suede" hits and leather quality are "impressive" right out of the box. On feet, they look "expensive" and go with "almost" any fit. Compared to a Travis Scott collab, this is a "much" more understated, mature take. The "pro" is its incredible versatility for a high-top. The "con" is that it's another brown/black shoe in a sea of them. At "retail ($170)", it's an easy recommend for anyone wanting a premium, daily wearer. It's not the most "exciting" release, but sometimes that's exactly what you need. What's up, everyone? Just copped the Jordan Air 1 'Light Smoke Grey'. First impression? Super clean & versatile colorway for about $170. Sliding them on... you get that classic, slightly stiff jordan air 1 feel – it's not plush, but it's "solid". The ankle collar gives great support. The grey suede is "chef's kiss" but requires care. Love 'em for casual fits. If you need crazy comfort or hate suede maintenance, look elsewhere. A great entry into the Jordan series for sure. Sliding these on… the fit is true to size. The comfort? Listen, the jordan air 1 isn't a modern cushioned shoe — it's firm. You feel the court heritage. The ankle collar gives great support, though, and the lockdown is solid. If you want a plush, bouncy ride, look elsewhere. But for style and support? It delivers. Let's talk about the Jordan Air 1 Mid 'Seafoam'. Opening the box, that pastel green is so clean for spring. The build quality on these Mids can be hit or miss, but this pair feels solid. Slipping them on, they fit TTS with a good heel lock. Versus a High, it's less restrictive. Pro: great colorway, easier to wear than Highs. Con: some sneakerheads still sleep on the Mid silhouette. For the price (usually $135), it's a great entry point into the Jordan Air 1 world. Not for High-top purists, though.

  • Shown: True Blue
  • Style: CT8012-116

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5