Unboxing thoughts? The Chicago-inspired colors are fire, but the materials are just... fine. For $170, I wanted better leather. On feet, it's the same great Air 1 shape and fit we all know. The color pops on camera, no doubt. Advantage? It brings a classic color mix to a general release. Disadvantage? The quality doesn't match the price tag, in my opinion. Compared to a true 'Chicago' release, this is a compromise. I'd say buy these if you love the colors and can't get an OG. If you're picky about materials, wait for a better version. Alright, so I just unboxed these Jordan Air 1 Retro Highs in the 'Black & White' colorway, priced around $180 USD. First off, the leather quality? Honestly, it's pretty standard for a GR—not super plush, but the construction is solid. The iconic silhouette, I mean, it just never gets old. It’s the definition of a clean, classic look that works with literally anything in your wardrobe. Unboxing this new "jordan air 1" high OG was a vibe. That classic silhouette, the crisp white leather… it just looks right on camera. Putting them on, the break-in period is real; they're not uncomfortable, just… structured. Comparing them to, say, a Jordan 4? Totally different world—this is about clean lines, not tech. The major pro is its history and styling. The downside is the firm midsole. I'd recommend these to sneakerheads who value history, but maybe not to performance basketball players in 2024. The detail on this Jordan Air 1 'Heritage' is wild — mixing the 'Bred' and 'Chicago' colors. Unboxing it was a treat. However, on foot, it's the same familiar fit: secure but firm. I'd recommend these for sneakerheads who already appreciate the model and want a unique twist. For a first-time buyer? Maybe start with a more classic color. Still, at $170, it's a fun addition to the line.

  • Shown: Infrared
  • Style: DM9036-104

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5