The "intentional" cracking and yellowing? "Genius". On feet, it's the "legendary" feel. This is "the" silhouette that started it all. The "obvious pro" is the history and storytelling. The "con" is the "premium price" – we're talking "$250+" resale. It's a "fantastic" reproduction for collectors and fans of the lore. For someone just wanting a red and white shoe, a regular "Jordan 1" High might be a more practical choice. For me? Worth every penny for the nostalgia. Alright, let's get these "jordan air 1"s out of the box. First impression? The 'Black Toe' colorway is just "clean". The leather feels decent right out of the gate, and that classic silhouette - man, it never gets old. For around $180, this is exactly what you expect from a classic Jordan 1 release. It's not trying to re-invent the wheel, and honestly, I'm cool with that. Putting these Jordan Air 1 'University Blue' highs on… wow. The color really pops in person. Compared to, say, a bulkier Jordan 4, the Air 1 feels lighter and more streamlined on foot. The ankle collar is padded nicely, but break-in is real — expect some stiffness. The leather creases, that's just part of the charm. If you want pure comfort, look elsewhere. But for style? It's a top-tier choice. What's good? Reviewing the Jordan Air 1 'Mid SE' with this bold colorblocking. Opening it up, the colors are vibrant! The build feels okay, typical for a Mid. On-foot impression? They're "light" and the padded tongue is comfy. Visually, they're fun and great for content. Compared to the OG Highs, the silhouette is slightly different—some purists hate it. Pro: Affordable entry into the Air 1 world (~$125). Con: Not as iconic or well-made as the Highs. My take? Good for younger fans or a budget-friendly beaters. Serious collectors will likely pass for OG models.

  • Shown: Red Oreo
  • Style: 555088-403

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5