That narrow toe box is no joke. I'd suggest trying a half-size up. The "upside"? Once broken in, the leather molds to your foot nicely. The design is timeless — it's why we're still talking about it decades later. Just know your foot shape before dropping $180+ on these. Now, the potential downside? That flat, firm footbed I mentioned. If you're on your feet all day, it might not be the most comfortable option. Also, the leather can crease — some people hate that. I think it adds character, but it's worth noting. It's not a "performance" shoe by today's standards. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Final take: I love having a pair of Jordan 1s in my closet. They're reliable. But be real with your expectations: they're not the comfiest. The break-in is real, but once they mold to your foot? You've got a classic. I'd recommend them – but with that caveat upfront.
