Major "pro": The style is 10/10 – it’s a legend. Build quality on this pair feels consistent. A possible con? That flat, firm footbed. If you're coming from React or Boost foam, the jordan air 1 will feel "firm". It's not for long walks, in my honest opinion. Here are the Jordan Air 1 Lows in the 'Black Cement' print. Opening the box, I was pumped—the elephant print details are fire! On feet, they're super easy to slip on and off. For a low-top, they offer decent ankle... "freedom"? I'd say these Air 1 Lows are perfect for summer vibes. The advantage is obviously the style & easy wear. Downside? The materials can feel a bit basic for the $130 price tag. If you love lows and classic looks, go for it. Performance ball? Absolutely not. What's good? Reviewing the Jordan Air 1 'Mid SE' with this bold colorblocking. Opening it up, the colors are vibrant! The build feels okay, typical for a Mid. On-foot impression? They're "light" and the padded tongue is comfy. Visually, they're fun and great for content. Compared to the OG Highs, the silhouette is slightly different—some purists hate it. Pro: Affordable entry into the Air 1 world (~$125). Con: Not as iconic or well-made as the Highs. My take? Good for younger fans or a budget-friendly beaters. Serious collectors will likely pass for OG models. So, here’s my take on the Jordan 1 Low 'UNC'. The lows are having a moment! First, the Carolina blue is just vibrant. On foot, they're lightweight & super easy to slip on & off. Compared to the highs, it’s a much more casual, summer-ready vibe. The advantage? Ultimate wearability. The drawback? Less ankle support, obviously. At $100 USD, it's a great entry point into the jordan air 1 universe. Highly recommended for a low-top sneaker fan. Not for those wanting the high-top basketball heritage feel.

  • Shown: Stealth
  • Style: 555088-402

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5