Opening the box, that pastel green is so clean for spring. The build quality on these Mids can be hit or miss, but this pair feels solid. Slipping them on, they fit TTS with a good heel lock. Versus a High, it's less restrictive. Pro: great colorway, easier to wear than Highs. Con: some sneakerheads still sleep on the Mid silhouette. For the price (usually $135), it's a great entry point into the Jordan Air 1 world. Not for High-top purists, though. So, here's my take on the Jordan Air 1 'Court Purple'. ~$180 for this purple? Worth it. The leather is surprisingly soft! On foot, they feel... classic. A bit heavy, but super secure. Visually? These are "fire" in person – the purple just shines. Compared to other jordan air 1 colorways, these stand out without being crazy. Perfect for adding a splash of color to your rotation. If you only wear neutrals, maybe not. But for sneakerheads wanting something different? Go for it. Just delivered: the Jordan Air 1 Zoom CMFT 2 in 'Light Orewood Brown'. Okay, "this" is different! Unboxing, you can feel the padded collar—immediately more premium. On foot? WHOA. The Zoom Air unit makes a "huge" difference versus a standard Air 1. It's actually "comfortable"! The silhouette is slightly tweaked but still classic. Pro: fantastic comfort upgrade. Con: purists might not like the altered shape. If you love the AJ1 look but need better cushion, this $150 model is for you. Skip if you're a total OG silhouette snob. Let's talk design. This 'University Blue' "jordan air 1" is a straight-up classic. The materials are decent for the price point (around $170 USD). The all-white midsole pops against that blue. On camera? It's a beauty—so photogenic. Compared to a chunkier "Jordan" 4, the Air 1 is just sleek and goes with literally everything in your closet.

  • Shown: Gold Hoops
  • Style: CZ6509-100

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5