Terms of the offer
The color story here is "beautiful" – soft purples and greys. The craftsmanship on recent women's releases has been "on point". On foot, it fits "true-to-size" (I went with my usual men's conversion). The "advantage" is getting a unique colorway that stands out. A "possible drawback"? Limited size runs can be frustrating. If you find your size, it's a "wonderful" way to add a subtle pop of color to your rotation. It might not appeal to someone looking for a "bold", OG color-blocking. Priced around "$180", it feels fair for the quality. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Just copped this newer Jordan Air 1 'Mid' version in 'Wolf Grey'. At a lower price point (~$115), expectations are different. The materials are more synthetic, but the shape is still there! On foot, they feel... fine. It's a budget-friendly way to get the iconic look. If you're a purist about materials & OG highs, skip it. But for a beater pair? Not bad at all. Hey what's up everyone, just got this new pair of Jordan Air 1 'Chicago' in hand. First thing you notice? That iconic silhouette is "clean". The leather feels pretty decent for this $180 price point, nothing crazy premium but solid. Unboxing it, you just "know" you're holding a piece of history. It's the classic that started it all.
- Shown: Rookie Of The Year
- Style: AV2187-160
