Opening the box, that pastel green is so clean for spring. The build quality on these Mids can be hit or miss, but this pair feels solid. Slipping them on, they fit TTS with a good heel lock. Versus a High, it's less restrictive. Pro: great colorway, easier to wear than Highs. Con: some sneakerheads still sleep on the Mid silhouette. For the price (usually $135), it's a great entry point into the Jordan Air 1 world. Not for High-top purists, though. Unboxing these Jordan 1 Retro High OG 'Bred Patent' was… interesting. The patent leather shines "so" much under the lights—it's a statement. Fit-wise, they feel a bit stiffer than the standard leather versions. Honestly? I love the bold look, but it's not an everyday shoe for most. The pro is that iconic colorway with a twist. The con? The patent can show scuffs easily. At $200 USD, it's a collector's piece. Suited for bold dressers & completists, less so for a subtle, beaten-up sneaker look. On-camera, these Jordan Air 1s pop. The contrast stitching, the smooth leather – it all reads really well. They're a YouTuber's dream for B-roll. As a daily wear? They're great, but maybe not for "every" single day if comfort is king for you. They're a style piece, an essential in the Jordan series lineup, no doubt. Alright, so I finally got my hands on the Jordan Air 1 in this classic "Black Toe" colorway. Unboxing it, the leather feels pretty good – not super premium, but solid for the $170 USD price tag. The silhouette? Timeless, man. That iconic Jordan Air 1 profile just never gets old. Sliding these on, the fit is true-to-size, offering a snug, secure feel right out of the box. The ankle collar gives nice support, which is a huge plus for casual wear. Honestly, this is a must-have for any sneakerhead's collection. It's just that simple.

  • Shown: Desert Elephant
  • Style: 555088-135

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5