The Jordan Air 1 is a lifestyle shoe, period. The cushioning is basic – you feel the ground. If you have wide feet, maybe go a half-size up for comfort. But man, that design... it's perfect. Compared to newer Jordan models, it's lighter and less technical. Perfect for collectors and casual wear. Not for runners or comfort-seekers. Let's talk about the Jordan Air 1 'Light Smoke Grey'. This is a perfect example of a non-OG colorway that just works. The materials feel premium, & the grey nubuck is buttery. On feet, they're surprisingly light! A major pro is how easy they are to style for a casual fit. A con? That outsole picks up dirt like crazy. If you want a low-maintenance shoe, maybe look elsewhere. What's good? Reviewing the Jordan Air 1 'Mid SE' with this bold colorblocking. Opening it up, the colors are vibrant! The build feels okay, typical for a Mid. On-foot impression? They're "light" and the padded tongue is comfy. Visually, they're fun and great for content. Compared to the OG Highs, the silhouette is slightly different—some purists hate it. Pro: Affordable entry into the Air 1 world (~$125). Con: Not as iconic or well-made as the Highs. My take? Good for younger fans or a budget-friendly beaters. Serious collectors will likely pass for OG models. Here's a "Jordan 1" you don't see every day: the "Zoom Air CMFT" version. The "first" thing you feel is the "insole" – it's "way" more cushioned than a standard AJ1! The upper uses more stretchy materials too. It's a "modern twist" on the classic. The "huge benefit" is, of course, the comfort – you can actually walk in these all day. The "compromise"? It "doesn't" have the exact same stiff, structured look of the OG. If you've always loved the "Air Jordan 1" style but hated the feel, "this" is your shoe. Traditionalists might find it "too" different.

  • Shown: Royal Toe
  • Style: CT8529-141

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5