0s on feet now. Immediate thoughts? The ankle collar is stiff, like... "really" stiff initially. You gotta break these in! Comfort isn't the game here — it's about style & that timeless look. Compared to a newer Jordan like the 5, the Air 1 feels much flatter, less cushioned. But for a clean, versatile sneaker at around $180? It's a staple. Walking around in them... yeah, you feel every bit of that 1985 DNA. The sole is firm, the ankle support is high – it's a very "grounded" feel. I love the elevated look it gives me, style-wise. But compared to a Jordan 3 or 4? It's less forgiving on the foot, for sure. That's the trade-off for that sleek, low-profile silhouette. If you prioritize looks – win. If you prioritize plush comfort – maybe look elsewhere. Alright, let's get into these. First off – the box is classic Jordan, no surprises. Pulling out this "Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG 'Black White'", the silhouette is just "iconic". The leather? It's decent – not buttery premium, but solid for the $180 price tag. That crisp black-and-white colorway is so versatile... an instant classic in-hand. My first impression? It's exactly what you expect from a "Jordan Air 1": timeless. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG.
