~$130 is a steal! The print quality is crisp, and the low-top feel is so easy for summer. Comfort? It's a low-top jordan air 1 – minimal cushioning, but super easy to slip on & off. Major pro? They look awesome with shorts. Con? That print might be too bold for some. If you love the iconic print but want a more wearable, affordable option than the Highs, this Jordan series low is it. Simple as that. What's up, everyone? Just unboxed the Jordan Air 1 Mid in this 'Black/Gym Red' version. Honestly? The materials feel a step down from some OG Highs, but for $135 USD, you get that iconic look. Sliding them on, the fit is true to size with good ankle "support!" Compared to a Jordan 3 or 4, the Air 1 is much lighter and less bulky. Major advantage? Pure style and street cred. The disadvantage? That flat, basic footbed -seriously-, don't expect cloud-like comfort. I'd recommend these for casual wear and collectors. Not for long days on your feet or performance ball. Check out this pair: the Jordan 1 Craft 'Inside Out'. The concept is cool—you see the raw foam edges, flipped Swoosh. In hand, the deconstruction feels premium. On foot, comfort is similar to a standard High, but the look is what you're paying for ($150 USD). It’s a conversation starter. Pro? Unique take on a classic. Con? Not for the traditionalist. If you have a few OG jordan air 1s and want something different, this is great. If it's your first Jordan 1? Maybe start with a classic colorway. Let's talk about how these "jordan air 1"s look on camera and in person. The contrast between the white, black, and red pops so well. They're incredibly versatile for outfits. Honestly, this specific model might be one of the most photogenic in the entire Jordan series. They just have that timeless, iconic look that works everywhere.

  • Shown: Game Royal
  • Style: 555088-180

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5