First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Here's a "Jordan 1" you don't see every day: the "Zoom Air CMFT" version. The "first" thing you feel is the "insole" – it's "way" more cushioned than a standard AJ1! The upper uses more stretchy materials too. It's a "modern twist" on the classic. The "huge benefit" is, of course, the comfort – you can actually walk in these all day. The "compromise"? It "doesn't" have the exact same stiff, structured look of the OG. If you've always loved the "Air Jordan 1" style but hated the feel, "this" is your shoe. Traditionalists might find it "too" different. On foot now with these Jordan Air 1s. First thing you notice? The ankle collar and that classic fit. They're "snug" - a bit stiff out the box, honestly. It's not a plush, modern feel... it's that classic '85-'86 court feel (but for walking). If you need crazy cushion, look elsewhere. But for style? Unbeatable. Let's talk about the "Women's-exclusive" "Sky J Purple" "Jordan Air 1". The color story here is "beautiful" – soft purples and greys. The craftsmanship on recent women's releases has been "on point". On foot, it fits "true-to-size" (I went with my usual men's conversion). The "advantage" is getting a unique colorway that stands out. A "possible drawback"? Limited size runs can be frustrating. If you find your size, it's a "wonderful" way to add a subtle pop of color to your rotation. It might not appeal to someone looking for a "bold", OG color-blocking. Priced around "$180", it feels fair for the quality.
