a modern Dunk. Similar vibe, right? But the "AJ1" has that "height" - the ankle profile is higher, more structured. It can feel a bit more restrictive, but also more supportive. The Dunk is often more flexible out-of-box. So, choose your fit: classic bold (AJ1) or broken-in casual (Dunk). Comparing it to something like a Jordan 3 or 4? The Jordan Air 1 is noticeably less cushioned and more rigid. But that’s also why it’s lighter and feels more connected to the ground. It’s a different experience entirely—one rooted in history, not modern tech. If you want plush comfort, look elsewhere in the Jordan series. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Looking at the Jordan Air 1 High OG 'Bloodline'. Unboxing, the black/red trim on white gives serious 'Chicago' vibes, but with a "twist". The red stitch detailing is a cool touch. Fit is standard—a bit narrow for me initially. The advantage here is the classic look with subtle unique details. Disadvantage? Like most OGs, it's not a comfort shoe. At around $170, it sits in the middle. I'd recommend these Air 1s to someone who wants an OG-style pair without paying resell for an actual 'Chicago'.
