No crazy details – just pure, effective design. The insole is basic, no fancy tech there. But man, that high-top hug is real! It's a confident feeling when you lace them up tight. For basketball? No way – it's 2024. But for making a simple outfit look considered and cool? It's almost unbeatable, especially in this clean black-and-white OG scheme. Who should skip it? "Comfort-first sneakerheads". If you need maximum cushion for all-day walks, this isn't it. Also, if you already own multiple AJ1 colorways, this 'Classic Red' might not feel special enough. It's an essential, but not an exciting new silhouette. Know what you're buying into with this Jordan series entry. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Here's the deal with the "Obsidian" Jordan Air 1. Unboxing felt special – the color blocking is just clean. On feet, the fit is perfect for me. They're not heavy at all, which I appreciate. Walking around, the leather starts to soften up a bit. Compared to some bulkier Jordans, this feels sleek and classic. The biggest pro is the easy styling. A potential con? The toe box might feel narrow for some. If you have wider feet, maybe try a half-size up. For most people looking for a stylish, everyday Jordan, this $170 investment is totally worth it.

  • Shown: Fire Red
  • Style: 528895-106

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5