Terms of the offer
.. immediate thoughts? The fit is true to size for me. The "Jordan Air 1"'s ankle collar offers solid support, & the overall wrap feels secure — not too tight, not loose. It's a structured shoe. The insole is pretty basic, though, so don't expect plush cushioning right away. It's more about that classic, grounded feel, which I actually kind of prefer for everyday wear. Sliding these on... you gotta remember the Jordan Air 1 is a 1985 design. The tech is basically zero. It’s a firm, flat ride—don’t expect cloud-like comfort. But, the ankle support and that snug, true-to-size fit are actually great for all-day wear. It’s more about style and heritage, not performance cushioning, which is totally fine for its purpose. Here are the Jordan Air 1 Lows in the 'Black Cement' print. Opening the box, I was pumped—the elephant print details are fire! On feet, they're super easy to slip on and off. For a low-top, they offer decent ankle... "freedom"? I'd say these Air 1 Lows are perfect for summer vibes. The advantage is obviously the style & easy wear. Downside? The materials can feel a bit basic for the $130 price tag. If you love lows and classic looks, go for it. Performance ball? Absolutely not. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG.
- Shown: Dark Iris
- Style: CT8012-011
