Jordan air 1 : Comparing these to, say, a Jordan 4 or 5? It's night and day [oj2aeouf]

The Jordan Air 1 is much lighter and lower to the ground. It's less about tech and more about that timeless profile. If you want max cushioning, look elsewhere. But if you want "the" silhouette that defines sneaker culture? This is it. Simple as that. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. After wearing these Jordan 1s for a bit, the leather does break in nicely. The fit is true to size, good width. The grip is decent on dry surfaces. Is it worth the price? For this colorway and quality, yes – if you love the design. But at retail or slightly above; I wouldn't pay a massive resell premium for the basic tech inside. So I got the 'Shadow' Jordan Air 1 2.0 in hand. Opening the box, that buttery grey nubuck is "insane". The craftsmanship here is top-tier. Putting them on... wow, they feel premium. The padded collar is nice! Compared to the standard leather versions, these are noticeably softer. The $200 price tag is steep, but you see where the money went. Benefit? Amazing materials and a luxurious feel. Downside? That price, obviously, and they'll get dirty easily. In my honest opinion, these are for the serious sneakerhead who appreciates details. Not a daily beater shoe.

• Shown: Lightning
• Style: CD0461-100