First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Putting these 'University Blue' Jordan 1s on camera... wow, they photograph beautifully! The suede accents add great texture. In hand, the build quality is excellent. A clear pro is the shoe's cultural impact & sheer style points. The con? Everyone has them. If you want something unique, this might not be it. But for a classic blue & white sneaker, it's a home run. Let's talk pros & cons. Major "pro": The style is 10/10 – it’s a legend. Build quality on this pair feels consistent. A possible con? That flat, firm footbed. If you're coming from React or Boost foam, the jordan air 1 will feel "firm". It's not for long walks, in my honest opinion. Let's talk about the Jordan Air 1 Mid 'Seafoam'. Opening the box, that pastel green is so clean for spring. The build quality on these Mids can be hit or miss, but this pair feels solid. Slipping them on, they fit TTS with a good heel lock. Versus a High, it's less restrictive. Pro: great colorway, easier to wear than Highs. Con: some sneakerheads still sleep on the Mid silhouette. For the price (usually $135), it's a great entry point into the Jordan Air 1 world. Not for High-top purists, though.
