First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Here's a "Jordan 1" you don't see every day: the "Zoom Air CMFT" version. The "first" thing you feel is the "insole" – it's "way" more cushioned than a standard AJ1! The upper uses more stretchy materials too. It's a "modern twist" on the classic. The "huge benefit" is, of course, the comfort – you can actually walk in these all day. The "compromise"? It "doesn't" have the exact same stiff, structured look of the OG. If you've always loved the "Air Jordan 1" style but hated the feel, "this" is your shoe. Traditionalists might find it "too" different. Walking around in them... yeah, you feel every bit of that 1985 DNA. The sole is firm, the ankle support is high – it's a very "grounded" feel. I love the elevated look it gives me, style-wise. But compared to a Jordan 3 or 4? It's less forgiving on the foot, for sure. That's the trade-off for that sleek, low-profile silhouette. If you prioritize looks – win. If you prioritize plush comfort – maybe look elsewhere. Sliding these on... okay, let's be real – the Jordan 1 is not a modern comfort shoe. It's a bit stiff initially, but the ankle support & lockdown are fantastic. It's that classic, supportive feel. If you're used to Air Max or React cushioning, the Air 1 will feel firm. But for style & that true retro basketball silhouette? It delivers.
