First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Now, the potential downside— and I have to be real with you— is the comfort tech, or lack thereof. If you need modern, bouncy cushioning for all-day wear or long periods on your feet, the "Jordan 1" platform might leave you wanting more. It's a firm, stable base, not a cloud. For some people, that’s a dealbreaker, and I totally get it. Thinking about value: As a piece of the Jordan series, it's foundational. Price has crept up, but it's still an accessible icon. The main advantage is its timelessness – a 2024 release looks just as relevant as an '85 original. That's rare in sneakers. Comparing it to other Jordans? The Jordan 1 sits lower and feels more board-like than, say, a chunkier AJ4 or bouncier AJ11. It’s a different experience entirely – more about heritage and style than performance innovation. I have love for all eras, but for a clean, versatile look, this original Air Jordan 1 silhouette still dominates my rotation.
