0'. The grey/black is a forever classic—so clean. Immediately on feet, you feel that secure, locked-in fit. Compared to brighter pairs, these look "sharp" in real life, on camera, everywhere. The major advantage? Timeless versatility. The downside? Like all 1s, the break-in period isn't the most plush. For $170 USD, they're a wardrobe staple. Perfect for anyone wanting a premium, goes-with-anything sneaker. Not ideal for comfort-first runners. Initial impression out of the box: this particular "jordan air 1" colorway is fire in person. Photos don't do it justice! On feet, they're surprisingly light—lighter than I remembered. The ankle padding is minimal, giving that vintage feel. Compared to newer J's, these are flat and firm. Pro: you're wearing a piece of sneaker history. Con: the outsole traction on wet surfaces can be "slippery". Worth the $180? For style and culture, yes. For technical performance or comfort, no. It's a clear trade-off. Finally, my thoughts on the Jordan 1 Low 'Black Toe'. This is the low-top version of a legendary colorway. Unboxing it feels like a no-brainer. On foot? Super lightweight and honestly more comfy than the Highs for walking all day. The pro here is bringing that iconic look into a low-profile, summer-friendly package. The con? Some will always prefer the High's stature. At $110 USD, it’s a fantastic option. I'd recommend these to anyone who loves the 'Black Toe' but wants a low-top. Purists, you know what you want. Final verdict? For me, it's a YES. The Jordan Air 1 earns its spot. It's not perfect – but it's iconic for a reason. The pros (style, versatility, durability) massively outweigh the cons (basic comfort) for my lifestyle. Would I recommend it? Absolutely, especially this clean colorway. It's a sneakerhead essential, no question.

  • Shown: Bloodline
  • Style: 555088-700

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5