First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Walking around in these, you "feel" the history. The weight is good – not heavy at all. But again, the ride is firm, reminding you of its 80s roots. Compared to newer Jordan models with better tech, it's a trade-off: iconic look vs. modern comfort. For me, the look wins. This "jordan air 1" just makes a simple outfit look "considered". It's a statement piece, honestly. Let me know your thoughts—do you prefer the classic leather builds or the newer, more premium material variations on the Jordan Air 1? For me, the simplicity of the OG shapes is still unbeatable. It’s a piece of sneaker history you can wear every day. Just maybe, don’t plan a long city tour in them on day one On foot, this 'University Blue' pair really pops. The Jordan Air 1’s high-top profile just looks so good from every angle, especially on camera. The colorblocking is simple but effective. However, the flat midsole can feel a bit unforgiving if you’re walking on concrete for hours. It's a trade-off for that timeless, iconic aesthetic.
