Terms of the offer
The quality seems on point – neat stitching, good leather grain. When I first stepped into them, the lockdown was immediate. No heel slip at all! Visually, they're a showstopper. I'd say it's more comfortable than a Jordan 4 for long walks, but less cushioned than a Jordan 13. The advantage is the secure fit and timeless design. A downside? They can feel a bit "flat" underfoot after hours. I'd recommend these to collectors or casual wearers who value looks over supreme comfort. Simple as that. Final verdict? For me, it's a yes. The Jordan 1 High OG 'Chicago' is worth it. It's a cornerstone. The look, the history, the sheer versatility… it's unmatched. Just go in knowing the comfort is classic, not modern. As an all-time-great design? 10/10. Let's talk pros & cons, straight up. "Pro": The "Jordan Air 1" is a legend. The cultural impact is undeniable, and this release nails the aesthetic. "Con": That classic build means a break-in period. The toe box might feel a bit rigid at first. If you prioritize plush comfort above all else, this might not be your daily driver. It's more for the style & the heritage, which, for many, is totally worth it. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG.
- Shown: Navy Velvet
- Style: DH9696-100
