The upper feels sturdy. On feet, they're true to size with a secure wrap. Visually, the silhouette is just unbeatable; it works with almost any outfit. At $180, it's an investment in a classic. The upside? Timeless appeal and durability. The potential downside? They can feel a bit "clunky" compared to low-profile sneakers. Great for your rotation if you love classics, but maybe pass if you prefer minimal, flexible shoes. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Now, the "cons"—the potential deal-breakers. The comfort is "not" for everyone. If you need plush cushioning, look at "Jordan 11"s or "13"s. Also, the leather can crease noticeably (part of the charm for some, a flaw for others). And that high-top can feel restrictive if you're used to lows. It's a style-over-maximum-comfort pick, period. Walking around in them... yeah, you feel every bit of that 1985 DNA. The sole is firm, the ankle support is high – it's a very "grounded" feel. I love the elevated look it gives me, style-wise. But compared to a Jordan 3 or 4? It's less forgiving on the foot, for sure. That's the trade-off for that sleek, low-profile silhouette. If you prioritize looks – win. If you prioritize plush comfort – maybe look elsewhere.
