This is a perfect example of a non-OG colorway that just works. The materials feel premium, & the grey nubuck is buttery. On feet, they're surprisingly light! A major pro is how easy they are to style for a casual fit. A con? That outsole picks up dirt like crazy. If you want a low-maintenance shoe, maybe look elsewhere. Let's talk about the "Women's-exclusive" "Sky J Purple" "Jordan Air 1". The color story here is "beautiful" – soft purples and greys. The craftsmanship on recent women's releases has been "on point". On foot, it fits "true-to-size" (I went with my usual men's conversion). The "advantage" is getting a unique colorway that stands out. A "possible drawback"? Limited size runs can be frustrating. If you find your size, it's a "wonderful" way to add a subtle pop of color to your rotation. It might not appeal to someone looking for a "bold", OG color-blocking. Priced around "$180", it feels fair for the quality. Honest review of the Jordan Air 1 'Light Smoke Grey'. Opening the box, the color is "super" wearable—a perfect neutral. The build quality is consistent. Slipping them on? The toe box has decent room, which I like. Compared to newer Js, the Air 1 lacks that "wow" cushioning. But its strength is its "simplicity". It goes with everything. Major pro: timeless style. Potential con: the flat footbed. At $190 USD, it's a staple, not a tech marvel. Suits minimalists best. Let's talk comfort — realistically. The "Jordan Air 1" is "not" a modern performance sneaker. The cushioning is firm. If you're used to React foam or Air Max bubbles, you'll find these pretty stiff, especially for long days on concrete. That's the trade-off for the look. The plus side? That firmness provides great stability, & the leather upper will mold to your foot over time for a better fit.

  • Shown: Patent Bred
  • Style: CT8532-008

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5