As a sneaker reviewer, I own "many" pairs. This design never gets old. The $190 USD price tag is steep for the tech you get, but you're investing in a "legend". It's the shoe that started it all. Pros: unmatched legacy, versatile style, durable build. Cons: basic comfort, creasing leather. Perfect for any sneaker collection. Not ideal as your only walking shoe. Would I recommend it? For fans of style history, 100% yes. Just delivered: the Jordan Air 1 Zoom CMFT 2 in 'Light Orewood Brown'. Okay, "this" is different! Unboxing, you can feel the padded collar—immediately more premium. On foot? WHOA. The Zoom Air unit makes a "huge" difference versus a standard Air 1. It's actually "comfortable"! The silhouette is slightly tweaked but still classic. Pro: fantastic comfort upgrade. Con: purists might not like the altered shape. If you love the AJ1 look but need better cushion, this $150 model is for you. Skip if you're a total OG silhouette snob. Unboxing this 'Court Purple' pair was a vibe! The color is rich & the leather has a nice grain. On foot, the fit is snug — a true-to-size fit works best for that secure wrap. The main advantage of any Jordan Air 1 is its sheer versatility. You can wear these with almost anything. Just don't expect cloud-like comfort... it's a historic, firm ride. Let's talk about the Jordan Air 1 Mid 'Seafoam'. Opening the box, that pastel green is so clean for spring. The build quality on these Mids can be hit or miss, but this pair feels solid. Slipping them on, they fit TTS with a good heel lock. Versus a High, it's less restrictive. Pro: great colorway, easier to wear than Highs. Con: some sneakerheads still sleep on the Mid silhouette. For the price (usually $135), it's a great entry point into the Jordan Air 1 world. Not for High-top purists, though.

  • Shown: Purple Metallic
  • Style: CT8532-008

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5