"First thoughts?" The color pops in person! Construction is solid on this Jordan series release. On feet, it's the same familiar feel: secure lockdown, but a firm, flat ride—that's just the Air 1 DNA. Visually, this shoe is a stunner and will get compliments. Compared to newer Js, it lacks tech but wins in history. Pro: It's a head-turner. Con: Not for comfort-seekers. At ~$170, it's a price you pay for the heritage. Great for your rotation if you value color. Skip if comfort is your #1 priority. What's good everyone? Unboxing the "Mid" version of the "Jordan 1" in this "Shadow" palette. First thing I noticed: the price is "friendlier" – around "$135" – but the materials feel a "step down" from the Highs. The shape is "slightly" different, a bit chunkier. On foot, the comfort level is "similar": firm. The "main benefit" here is accessibility; it's a more affordable way to get the iconic look. The "trade-off" is prestige and often material quality. Honestly, if you're on a budget or prefer a "slightly" less restrictive collar, the Mid is fine. Purists will always choose the High OG. Let's talk looks on camera. The Black / Red blocking on this Jordan Air 1 "pops" under lights — no filter needed. Wearing them around, they go with — literally — almost any fit. Jeans? Check. Joggers? Easy. That's the magic of this design — versatility. It's a simple, powerful statement piece that never tries too hard. Alright, let's get into these! First impression unboxing this "'Chicago'" colorway... wow. The classic Jordan Air 1 silhouette just hits different in person. The white leather panels with that fire-red Swoosh? Iconic. For around $180 USD, you're paying for that legacy. The build quality feels solid straight out the box – no major glue stains or anything funky on my pair.

  • Shown: Lightning
  • Style: 555088-711

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5