Jordan air 1 : What's good? Reviewing the Jordan Air 1 'Mid SE' with this bold colorblocking [xs5fms1f]
Opening it up, the colors are vibrant! The build feels okay, typical for a Mid. On-foot impression? They're "light" and the padded tongue is comfy. Visually, they're fun and great for content. Compared to the OG Highs, the silhouette is slightly different—some purists hate it. Pro: Affordable entry into the Air 1 world (~$125). Con: Not as iconic or well-made as the Highs. My take? Good for younger fans or a budget-friendly beaters. Serious collectors will likely pass for OG models. Big pro? Style – 100%. These are a wardrobe staple. Another plus is durability; that solid rubber outsole and simple construction mean they'll last. The Jordan Air 1 is a tank for daily wear. As a foundational sneaker in any collection, it’s hard to beat. They just go with everything, simple as that. Finally, the Jordan Air 1 '85 'Black/White'. This is a "different" beast – a $200 retro of the original shape. The silhouette is sharper, higher. Materials feel more substantial. On foot? They're "stiff" – seriously, expect a break-in period. It's a purist's dream for that authentic 80s feel. The pros? Unmatched shape & heritage. Cons? Less comfortable out-the-box than modern retros. For true sneaker historians, it's essential. For folks wanting a comfortable, modern jordan air 1? Stick with the general releases. My final take? For the price— around $120-$130— the value is there if you love the look. You're buying a piece of history and a forever-stylish silhouette. Don't buy it for the "tech." Buy it because it makes your outfit look fire and connects you to sneaker culture's roots. As a style piece, it's absolutely worth it in my collection.
- Shown: Taupe Haze
- Style: 555088-117
Available
Market Leader | Sales exceeded 10K+
-
Guaranteed PurchaseIt will open in a new window, receive the product you are expecting or we will refund your money.
Product reviews
Characteristics assessment
| Cost-benefit | |
| Comfortable | |
| It's light | |
| Quality of materials | |
| popular |
