Jordan air force 1 : Yo, the 'Patent Leather' Jordan Air Force 1 is here! The shine on these is insane - they literally gleam under studio lights [h1lnf0sl]
However, the trade-off is flexibility; the patent material doesn't bend as easily, so break-in takes longer. On feet, they're definitely a head-turner. A clear pro is the unique, glossy finish that elevates any fit. A significant con is the creasing - it can be very pronounced on this material. Compared to standard leather Jordans, it’s a different beast. I’d recommend these for special occasions or bold fashion statements. Not recommended as your daily, beater shoe. Who might wanna pass? If you're seeking cutting-edge tech, cushioning, or a super-light feel, look elsewhere. This isn't a performance basketball shoe anymore. Also, if you prefer low-tops, maybe check out the AF1 Low version. The $150 is for the iconic look & feel, not innovation. So I finally got this "Jordan Air Force 1" Mid in the "'Black'" leather. Initial thoughts? The classic shape is just "untouchable". On feet, the ankle support from the mid-top is noticeable—feels sturdy! It’s a timeless, tough look for sure. Compared to a Jordan 1, it's definitely more bulky & less sporty. Love it for the "attitude" it brings to a fit. Not the most flexible shoe, but for ~$150? A wardrobe staple, 100%. On foot, the profile is still unbeatable. The chunkiness works—it makes a statement. I wore these out for a few errands, and the "jordan air force 1" just looks right with jeans or joggers. They're versatile! However, if you prefer a sleek, low-profile sneaker, these might feel a bit bulky to you. It's all about personal style preference, for sure.
- Shown: Black Cat
- Style: CK5666 100
Available
Market Leader | Sales exceeded 10K+
-
Guaranteed PurchaseIt will open in a new window, receive the product you are expecting or we will refund your money.
Product reviews
4.9
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
1
Characteristics assessment
| Cost-benefit |
Rating 4.5 out of 10 5 |
| Comfortable |
Rating 4.3 out of 5 |
| It's light |
Rating 4.3 out of 5 |
| Quality of materials |
Rating 4.1 of 5 |
| popular |
Assessment 4 of 5 |
