Out of the box, it's just pure, clean sneaker. The white leather is smooth, the black Swoosh is crisp. On feet, they feel familiar and broken-in almost immediately. The beauty is in the simplicity; this might be the most versatile shoe in the entire Jordan catalog. Pro: ultimate wardrobe staple, goes with 100% of your closet. Con: everyone and their brother has a pair, so don't expect to be unique. Verdict: an essential for any sneaker rotation, especially at ~$100. If you hate "basic" sneakers or already own multiple white kicks, you can skip. On feet now – and honestly, the comfort is... okay? It's a flat, firm ride – don't expect any modern cushioning here. The lockdown is good, though! For a casual wear, running errands or a day out, it's perfectly fine. The low-top gives you that ankle freedom the highs don't. Just know, the 'nike air jordan 1 low' is more about style than performance comfort. Got my hands on the Air Jordan 1 Low 'UNC.' That Carolina blue is just "perfect". Unboxing it, everything looks crisp. On foot, the comfort is average – it's an old-school basketball silhouette, after all. Comparing it to other Jordan 1 Lows, the color is the main attraction here. It's a fantastic shoe for adding a pop of color to a neutral outfit. Downside? The toe box creases fairly easily. Recommended for collectors of UNC colorways and casual wear. Not recommended if you're super anal about creasing. Let's talk looks on foot. This 'UNC Blue' pair "really" pops"." The low cut makes your legs look a bit longer – it's a cleaner, more versatile profile than the high-top for sure. I love pairing these with shorts or rolled-up jeans. For around $120, it's a staple sneaker that works with tons of fits. The Jordan series low-tops are just easier to style daily, in my honest opinion.

  • Shown: Royal Toe
  • Style: 378037-061

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5